[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13179849#comment-13179849
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-2834:
------------------------------

We can close this issue then?  (After adding a bit of 'how to do deferred 
deletes' to the manual?)
                
> Deferred deletes
> ----------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2834
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2834
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>
> Tangentally mentioned in a blog post, James Hamilton talks about deferred 
> deletes:
> {quote}
> If you have an application error, administrative error, or database 
> implementation bug that losses data, then it is simply gone unless you have 
> an offline copy. This, by the way, is why I'm a big fan of deferred delete.  
> This is a technique where deleted items are marked as deleted but not garbage 
> collected until some days or preferably weeks later.  Deferred delete is not 
> full protection but it has saved my butt more than once and I'm a believer. 
> See On Designing and Deploying Internet-Scale Services 
> (http://mvdirona.com/jrh/talksAndPapers/JamesRH_Lisa.pdf) for more detail.
> {quote}
> (See 
> http://perspectives.mvdirona.com/2010/04/07/StonebrakerOnCAPTheoremAndDatabases.aspx)
> Because deletes -- at least, after the initial write has been flushed from 
> memstore -- are tombstones, deferred delete in HBase could be supported if 
> somehow tombstones could be invalidated, an undelete operation in effect. 
> This could be accomplished by adding support for tombstones for deletes. 
> Would complicate major compaction but otherwise not touch much. A typical use 
> case might be "resurrect any data deleted from _ts1_ to _ts2_ ", a period of 
> 4 hours when an application error was operative. In this case a new write 
> would be issued to the table that is a tombstone covering any deletes over 
> that period of time. Users would defer major compactions until safe 
> checkpoint periods. 
> Such guarantees could optionally be extended to the memstoe by using 
> tombstones there as well. But it would probably be sufficient to provide 
> guidance that forcing a flush is  necessary to insure edits are persisted in 
> a way that allows for undeletion.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to