[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16179896#comment-16179896
]
Umesh Agashe commented on HBASE-18183:
--------------------------------------
[~anoop.hbase], thanks for your reply. I am looking into HBASE-18703 which is
regarding inconsistency between doMiniBathMutate() and processRowsWithLocks().
The only internal implementation of RowProcessor is MultiRowMutationProcessor.
This is used by mutateRows() methods. I am modifying doMiniBatchMutate so that
it can be called by mutateRows() methods (with and without locks as an explicit
argument). This leaves processRowsWithLocks() and it's use of RowProcessor.
Currently BaseRowProcessorEndpoint instantiates and calls
processRowsWithLocks(). It may be sufficient, if we can modify
processRowsWithLocks() to call doMiniBatchMutate() and CP hooks can be used.
This heads up on what I am thinking regarding HBASE-18703. Perhaps when patch
is ready we can discuss this further.
> Region interface cleanup for CP expose
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18183
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18183
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Coprocessors
> Reporter: Anoop Sam John
> Assignee: Anoop Sam John
> Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-4
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
