[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16209046#comment-16209046
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-18906:
-----------------------------------

I have uploaded a patch in HBASE-18989 where I added more methods in 
CompactionLifeCycleTracker for better tracking the completion of a compaction 
request. I think we can do the same for flush.

Use a tracker instead of returning a CompletableFuture is that, we will also 
pass the tracker to the CP hooks so you can carry some information on the track 
and pass them to the hooks.

Thanks.

> Investigate Phoenix usages of Region#waitForXXX APIs
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-18906
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18906
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Coprocessors
>            Reporter: Anoop Sam John
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-4
>
>
> While reviewing HBASE-18183, Andy pointed out that Phoenix uses 
> waitForFlushesAndCompactions and/or waitForFlushes for diff reasons.  This 
> issue is to see why they need them and whether alternate ways are possible. 
> This seems to be too much internal stuff and a normal CP hook calling these 
> would be dangerous.
> If there are alternate ways for Phoenix not to use this and not landing in 
> issues (As said by Andy) we should suggest/fix for them.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to