[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13192612#comment-13192612
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-5231:
------------------------------

bq. The relationship between this feature and balancer sloppiness is definitely 
within the scope of discussion.

I don't understand how.

bq. Since the existing tests for load balancer pass, there is no regression 
introduced by this feature.

The existing test uses table balancing?  (There is no test for table balancer 
that I can see)

-1 on this patch going into 0.92. Its incoherent.
                
> Backport HBASE-3373 (per-table load balancing) to 0.92
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5231
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5231
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Zhihong Yu
>             Fix For: 0.92.1
>
>         Attachments: 5231-v2.txt, 5231.addendum, 5231.txt
>
>
> This JIRA backports per-table load balancing to 0.90

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to