[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16270192#comment-16270192
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-19357:
----------------------------------------
{quote}
In CacheConfig.java :
- public static final String BUCKET_CACHE_COMBINED_KEY =
- "hbase.bucketcache.combinedcache.enabled";
I assume deprecation should be added for the above.
{quote}
No need I believe as CacheConfig is marked Private. The config as such is
deprecated. We add log when user explicitly set it with false. On that log, we
normally log warn for these kind of situations. It is not an error occurred in
the server run time right? I think warn is enough. WDYT?
> Bucket cache no longer L2 for LRU cache
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-19357
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19357
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Anoop Sam John
> Assignee: Anoop Sam John
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-1
>
> Attachments: HBASE-19357.patch, HBASE-19357.patch
>
>
> When Bucket cache is used, by default we dont configure it as an L2 cache
> alone. The default setting is combined mode ON where the data blocks to
> Bucket cache and index/bloom blocks go to LRU cache. But there is a way to
> turn this off and make LRU as L1 and Bucket cache as a victim handler for L1.
> It will be just L2.
> After the off heap read path optimization Bucket cache is no longer slower
> compared to L1. We have test results on data sizes from 12 GB. The Alibaba
> use case was also with 12 GB and they have observed a ~30% QPS improve over
> the LRU cache.
> This issue is to remove the option for combined mode = false. So when Bucket
> cache is in use, data blocks will go to it only and LRU will get only index
> /meta/bloom blocks. Bucket cache will no longer be configured as a victim
> handler for LRU.
> Note : WHen external cache is in use, there only the L1 L2 thing comes. LRU
> will be L1 and external cache act as its L2. That make full sense.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
