[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16279774#comment-16279774
]
Edward Bortnikov commented on HBASE-18294:
------------------------------------------
Chiming in ...
This question seems to be irrelevant to whether MSLAB use is a per-table or
global flag. Agreed that we should avoid adding new configurations whenever
possible.
Let's try to remain factual in the decisions we make. The goal is to get the
best possible performance from a machine with given RAM resources, on-heap or
not. [~eshcar], could you please publish some numbers that validate the
solution's value? [~anoop.hbase], mind sharing any data that proves the
opposite?
Thanks!
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap occupancy
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18294
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Eshcar Hillel
> Assignee: Eshcar Hillel
> Attachments: HBASE-18294.01.patch, HBASE-18294.02.patch,
> HBASE-18294.03.patch, HBASE-18294.04.patch, HBASE-18294.05.patch,
> HBASE-18294.06.patch
>
>
> A region is flushed if its memory component exceed a threshold (default size
> is 128MB).
> A flush policy decides whether to flush a store by comparing the size of the
> store to another threshold (that can be configured with
> hbase.hregion.percolumnfamilyflush.size.lower.bound).
> Currently the implementation (in both cases) compares the data size
> (key-value only) to the threshold where it should compare the heap size
> (which includes index size, and metadata).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
