[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16289091#comment-16289091
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-19489:
--------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.1-JDK8 #2037 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.1-JDK8/2037/])
HBASE-19489 Adds QUICK_HADOOPCHECK flag to check against only the latest (appy: 
rev 8efe3c06f9930cd1f627715c78f72af187c6bb72)
* (edit) dev-support/hbase-personality.sh


> Check against only the latest maintenance release in pre-commit hadoopcheck.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-19489
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19489
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Appy
>            Assignee: Appy
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.3.2, 1.4.1, 1.5.0, 1.2.7, 2.0.0-beta-1, 1.1.13
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-19489.master.001.patch, 
> HBASE-19489.master.002.patch, HBASE-19489.master.003.patch, 
> HBASE-19489.master.004.patch, HBASE-19489.master.005.patch, 
> HBASE-19489.master.006.patch, HBASE-19489.master.007.patch, 
> test_change_in_hbase_common.master.patch
>
>
> (copied from dev thread)
> {color:green}
> | +1  | hadoopcheck | 52m 1s |        Patch does not cause any errors with 
> Hadoop 2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 2.6.5 2.7.1 2.7.2 2.7.3 2.7.4 or 3.0.0-alpha4. 
> |
> {color}
> Almost 1 hr to check against 10 versions. And it's only going to increase as 
> more 2.6.x, 2.7.x and 3.0.x releases come out.
> Suggestion here is simple, let's check against only the latest maintenance 
> release for each minor version i.e. 2.6.5, 2.7.4 and 3.0.0-alpha4.
> Advantage: Save ~40 min on pre-commit time.
> Justification:
> - We only do compile checks. Maintenance releases are not supposed to be 
> doing API breaking changes. So checking against maintenance release for each 
> minor version should be enough.
> - We rarely see any hadoop check -1, and most recent ones have been due to 
> 3.0. These will still be caught.
> - Nightly can still check against all hadoop versions (since nightlies are 
> supposed to do holistic testing)
> - Analyzing 201 precommits from 10100 (11/29) - 10300 (12/8) (10 days):
>   138 had +1 hadoopcheck
>    15 had -1 hadoopcheck
>   (others probably failed even before that - merge issue, etc)
> Spot checking some 
> failures:(10241,10246,10225,10269,10151,10156,10184,10250,10298,10227,10294,10223,10251,10119,10230)
> 10241: All 2.6.x failed. Others didn't run
> 10246: All 10 versions failed.
> 10184: All 2.6.x and 2.7.x failed. Others didn't run
> 10223: All 10 versions failed 
> 10230: All 2.6.x failed. Others didn't run
>   
> Common pattern being, all maintenance versions fail together.
> (idk, why sometimes 2.7.* are not reported if 2.6.* fail, but that's 
> irrelevant to this discussion).
> What do you say - only check latest maintenance releases in precommit (and 
> let nightlies do holistic testing against all versions)?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to