[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13199459#comment-13199459
 ] 

jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on HBASE-5229:
------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3748/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for hbase.


Summary
-------

This builds on HBASE-3584, HBASE-5203, and HBASE-5304.

Multiple Rows can be locked and applied atomically as long as the application 
ensures that all rows reside in the same Region (by presplitting or a custom 
RegionSplitPolicy).
At SFDC we can use this to colocate subsets of a tenant's data and allow atomic 
operations over these subsets.

Obviously this is an advanced features and this prominently called out in the 
Javadoc.


This addresses bug HBASE-5229.
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5229


Diffs
-----

  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HTable.java
 1239953 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HTableInterface.java
 1239953 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/MultiRowMutation.java
 PRE-CREATION 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/RowMutation.java
 1239953 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/coprocessor/CoprocessorHost.java
 1239953 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/io/HbaseObjectWritable.java
 1239953 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/ipc/HRegionInterface.java
 1239953 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegion.java
 1239953 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegionServer.java
 1239953 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/rest/client/RemoteHTable.java
 1239953 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/TestFromClientSide.java
 1239953 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/TestAtomicOperation.java
 1239953 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3748/diff


Testing
-------

Tests added to TestFromClientSide and TestAtomicOperation


Thanks,

Lars


                
> Explore building blocks for "multi-row" local transactions.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5229
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5229
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: client, regionserver
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>            Assignee: Lars Hofhansl
>             Fix For: 0.94.0
>
>         Attachments: 5229-multiRow.txt, 5229-seekto-v2.txt, 5229-seekto.txt, 
> 5229.txt
>
>
> HBase should provide basic building blocks for multi-row local transactions. 
> Local means that we do this by co-locating the data. Global (cross region) 
> transactions are not discussed here.
> After a bit of discussion two solutions have emerged:
> 1. Keep the row-key for determining grouping and location and allow efficient 
> intra-row scanning. A client application would then model tables as 
> HBase-rows.
> 2. Define a prefix-length in HTableDescriptor that defines a grouping of 
> rows. Regions will then never be split inside a grouping prefix.
> #1 is true to the current storage paradigm of HBase.
> #2 is true to the current client side API.
> I will explore these two with sample patches here.
> --------------------
> Was:
> As discussed (at length) on the dev mailing list with the HBASE-3584 and 
> HBASE-5203 committed, supporting atomic cross row transactions within a 
> region becomes simple.
> I am aware of the hesitation about the usefulness of this feature, but we 
> have to start somewhere.
> Let's use this jira for discussion, I'll attach a patch (with tests) 
> momentarily to make this concrete.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to