[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16329562#comment-16329562 ]
stack commented on HBASE-18965: ------------------------------- Whats the story here [~uagashe]? You going to leave old implementation in place for 2.0.0 and not do this? If so, move out of beta-2? Move to 2.0.0 (general bucket for stuff that we'd like in 2.0.0 but won't do likely). > Create alternate API to processRowsWithLock() that doesn't take RowProcessor > as an argument > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-18965 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18965 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Coprocessors > Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-3 > Reporter: Umesh Agashe > Assignee: Umesh Agashe > Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2 > > > Create alternate API to processRowsWithLock() that doesn't take RowProcessor > as an argument. Also write example showing how coprocessors and batchMutate() > can be used instead of RowProcessors. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)