[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16329562#comment-16329562
]
stack commented on HBASE-18965:
-------------------------------
Whats the story here [~uagashe]? You going to leave old implementation in place
for 2.0.0 and not do this? If so, move out of beta-2? Move to 2.0.0 (general
bucket for stuff that we'd like in 2.0.0 but won't do likely).
> Create alternate API to processRowsWithLock() that doesn't take RowProcessor
> as an argument
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18965
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18965
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Coprocessors
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-3
> Reporter: Umesh Agashe
> Assignee: Umesh Agashe
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2
>
>
> Create alternate API to processRowsWithLock() that doesn't take RowProcessor
> as an argument. Also write example showing how coprocessors and batchMutate()
> can be used instead of RowProcessors.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
