[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13203236#comment-13203236
 ] 

Nicolas Spiegelberg commented on HBASE-5335:
--------------------------------------------

@stack: have you done a lot of testing with killing ZKQuorumPeers on clusters 
with a lot of regions?  We've good perf with a large number of ZK nodes during 
normal operation, but bad latency spikes when a peer restarts and the other 
peers have to update the restarted peer's state.
                
> Dynamic Schema Configurations
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5335
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5335
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Nicolas Spiegelberg
>            Assignee: Nicolas Spiegelberg
>              Labels: configuration, schema
>
> Currently, the ability for a core developer to add per-table & per-CF 
> configuration settings is very heavyweight.  You need to add a reserved 
> keyword all the way up the stack & you have to support this variable 
> long-term if you're going to expose it explicitly to the user.  This has 
> ended up with using Configuration.get() a lot because it is lightweight and 
> you can tweak settings while you're trying to understand system behavior 
> [since there are many config params that may never need to be tuned].  We 
> need to add the ability to put & read arbitrary KV settings in the HBase 
> schema.  Combined with online schema change, this will allow us to safely 
> iterate on configuration settings.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to