[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chia-Ping Tsai updated HBASE-19900:
-----------------------------------
Release Note:
This fix makes the following changes to how client handle the both of action
result and region exception.
1) honor the action result rather region exception. If the action have both of
true result and region exception, the action is fine as the exception is caused
by other actions which are in the same region.
2) honor the action exception rather region exception. If the action have both
of action exception and region exception, we deal with the action exception
only. If we also handle the region exception for the same action, it will
introduce the negative count of actions in progress. The
AsyncRequestFuture#waitUntilDone will block forever.
> Region-level exception destroy the result of batch
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-19900
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19900
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.3.2, 1.5.0, 1.2.7, 2.0.0-beta-2, 1.4.2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-19900.v0.patch
>
>
> 1) decrease action count repeatedly
> If the AsyncRequestFuture#waitUntilDone return prematurely, user will get the
> incorrect results. Or user will be block by AsyncRequestFuture#waitUntilDone
> as the count is never equal with 0.
> 2) the successive result will be overwrited
> 3) The failed op is added to RetriesExhaustedWithDetailsException repeatedly
> AsyncRequestFutureImpl#receiveMultiAction process the action-lever error
> first, and then add the region-level exception to each action. Hence, user
> may get the various exceptions for the same action (row op) from the
> RetriesExhaustedWithDetailsException.
> In fact, if both of action-level exception and region-lever exception exist,
> they always have the same context. I'm not sure whether that is what
> RetriesExhaustedWithDetailsException want. As i see it, we shouldn't have the
> duplicate ops in RetriesExhaustedWithDetailsException since that may confuse
> users if they catch the RetriesExhaustedWithDetailsException to check the
> invalid operations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
