[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16398881#comment-16398881
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-20090:
------------------------------------------------
+1. Thanks [~yuzhih...@gmail.com] for working on this.
> Properly handle Preconditions check failure in
> MemStoreFlusher$FlushHandler.run
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-20090
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20090
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ted Yu
> Assignee: Ted Yu
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: 20090-server-61260-01-000007.log, 20090.v6.txt,
> 20090.v7.txt, 20090.v8.txt, 20090.v9.txt
>
>
> Copied the following from a comment since this was better description of the
> race condition.
> The original description was merged to the beginning of my first comment
> below.
> With more debug logging, we can see the scenario where the exception was
> triggered.
> {code}
> 2018-03-02 17:28:30,097 DEBUG [MemStoreFlusher.0] regionserver.CompactSplit:
> Splitting TestTable,,1520011528142.0453f29030757eedb6e6a1c57e88c085.,
> compaction_queue=(0:0), split_queue=1
> 2018-03-02 17:28:30,098 DEBUG
> [RpcServer.priority.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=19,queue=1,port=16020]
> regionserver.IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy: ShouldSplit because
> info size=6.9G, sizeToCheck=256.0M, regionsWithCommonTable=1
> 2018-03-02 17:28:30,296 INFO
> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=24,queue=0,port=16020]
> regionserver.MemStoreFlusher: wake up flusher due to ABOVE_ONHEAP_LOWER_MARK
> 2018-03-02 17:28:30,297 DEBUG [MemStoreFlusher.1]
> regionserver.MemStoreFlusher: Flush thread woke up because memory above low
> water=381.5 M
> 2018-03-02 17:28:30,297 INFO
> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=25,queue=1,port=16020]
> regionserver.MemStoreFlusher: wake up flusher due to ABOVE_ONHEAP_LOWER_MARK
> 2018-03-02 17:28:30,298 DEBUG [MemStoreFlusher.1]
> regionserver.MemStoreFlusher: region
> TestTable,,1520011528142.0453f29030757eedb6e6a1c57e88c085. with size 400432696
> 2018-03-02 17:28:30,298 DEBUG [MemStoreFlusher.1]
> regionserver.MemStoreFlusher: region
> atlas_janus,,1519927429371.fbcb5e495344542daf8b499e4bac03ae. with size 0
> 2018-03-02 17:28:30,298 INFO [MemStoreFlusher.1]
> regionserver.MemStoreFlusher: Flush of region
> atlas_janus,,1519927429371.fbcb5e495344542daf8b499e4bac03ae. due to global
> heap pressure. Flush type=ABOVE_ONHEAP_LOWER_MARKTotal Memstore Heap
> size=381.9 MTotal Memstore Off-Heap size=0, Region memstore size=0
> 2018-03-02 17:28:30,298 INFO [MemStoreFlusher.1]
> regionserver.MemStoreFlusher: wake up by WAKEUPFLUSH_INSTANCE
> 2018-03-02 17:28:30,298 INFO [MemStoreFlusher.1]
> regionserver.MemStoreFlusher: Nothing to flush for
> atlas_janus,,1519927429371.fbcb5e495344542daf8b499e4bac03ae.
> 2018-03-02 17:28:30,298 INFO [MemStoreFlusher.1]
> regionserver.MemStoreFlusher: Excluding unflushable region
> atlas_janus,,1519927429371.fbcb5e495344542daf8b499e4bac03ae. - trying to
> find a different region to flush.
> {code}
> Region 0453f29030757eedb6e6a1c57e88c085 was being split.
> In HRegion#flushcache, the log from else branch can be seen in
> 20090-server-61260-01-000007.log :
> {code}
> synchronized (writestate) {
> if (!writestate.flushing && writestate.writesEnabled) {
> this.writestate.flushing = true;
> } else {
> if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
> LOG.debug("NOT flushing memstore for region " + this
> + ", flushing=" + writestate.flushing + ", writesEnabled="
> + writestate.writesEnabled);
> }
> {code}
> Meaning, region 0453f29030757eedb6e6a1c57e88c085 couldn't flush, leaving
> memory pressure at high level.
> When MemStoreFlusher ran to the following call, the region was no longer a
> flush candidate:
> {code}
> HRegion bestFlushableRegion =
> getBiggestMemStoreRegion(regionsBySize, excludedRegions, true);
> {code}
> So the other region,
> atlas_janus,,1519927429371.fbcb5e495344542daf8b499e4bac03ae. , was examined
> next. Since the region was not receiving write, the (current) Precondition
> check failed.
> The proposed fix is to convert the Precondition to normal return.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
