[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16416703#comment-16416703
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-20264:
--------------------------------

Results for branch HBASE-19064
        [build #77 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-19064/77/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-19064/77//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-19064/77//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-19064/77//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> Update Java prerequisite section with LTS rec and status of current GA JDKs
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-20264
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20264
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: documentation
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0, 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Sean Busbey
>            Assignee: Sean Busbey
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-20264.0.patch, HBASE-20264.1.patch
>
>
> Per the thread [\[DISCUSS\] strategy on Java 
> versions|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b7417aa8359e1beaa7caf47e8fa524296c499974e7467a541c6df415@%3Cdev.hbase.apache.org%3E]
> * Add Java 9 and Java 10 to the support matrix as NT
> * Add a NOTE to Java prereqs about "use a LTS version"
> For now, leave out talk about planning for timelines on LTS additions or 
> dropping older JDK support. Once we get over the initial hurdle of prepping 
> for Java 11 we'll hopefully have enough info to know how realistic the things 
> talked about in the thread are and we can include a writeup.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to