[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16430809#comment-16430809
]
stack commented on HBASE-20356:
-------------------------------
bq. It's definitely a balancing act. I'd equate Centos6 to some stone-age Linux
software at this point. While this is what "enterprises want", the cost we pay
is that we have to limit ourselves in what we can use. That mindset (not being
able to control our build-environment) is what makes me think that this is
something better to bite the bullet on now, rather than let it control our
destiny.
I like this sentiment.
For CentOS6 users, they'd use earlier hbase-thirdparty? Or should we build them
a version of hbase-thirdparty that has updated cli and old pb?
> protoc 3.5.1 can't compile on rhel6
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-20356
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20356
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dependencies, thirdparty
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-beta-2
> Reporter: Mike Drob
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.0.0, thirdparty-2.2.0
>
>
> We upgraded our internal protoc version, and now can't build on RHEL6.
> I get this build error:
> {noformat}
> 2018-04-05 08:15:21.929278 [ERROR] PROTOC FAILED: ... /lib64/libc.so.6:
> version `GLIBC_2.14' not found
> {noformat}
> See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/4109
> And this has come up before in https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/3718
> Looks like we need to be on 3.4.0, unless there's a compelling reason to be
> on something newer? Maybe roll back all the way to 3.3.0 which is what we
> were on before... was there a specific bug we needed to get addressed?
> cc: [~elserj] [~stack]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
