[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16442879#comment-16442879
 ] 

Mike Drob commented on HBASE-19543:
-----------------------------------

[~Apache9] - noticed a small behaviour change related to this patch. In 2.0 the 
{{ReplicationManager}} constructor calls {{replicationQueuesClient.init}} which 
will create the queues znode if it doesn't exist ({{/hbase/replication/rs}}).

The new implementation skips this, it has a ReplicationPeerManager that has 
ReplicationQueueStorage but only creates the queues znode when a process 
attempts to claim a queue. Was this change intentional or an oversight?

> Abstract a replication storage interface to extract the zk specific code
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-19543
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19543
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: proc-v2, Replication
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-19543-HBASE-19397-v1.patch, 
> HBASE-19543-HBASE-19397-v2.patch, HBASE-19543-HBASE-19397-v3.patch, 
> HBASE-19543-HBASE-19397.patch, HBASE-19543-HBASE-19397.patch
>
>
> For now, we will do sanity checks at the same time when updating replication 
> peer. But this is not a safe way for procedure based replication peer 
> modification.
> For the old zk watcher way, the only thing is updating the data on zk, so if 
> the data is updated and then we crashes, there is no problem.
> For the new procedure way, we need to trigger refresh by ourselves after 
> updating zk. If we crashes after the updating and before we record the state 
> change of the procedure, we may fail with IllegalArgumentException when we 
> execute the procedure next time since the data on zk has already been updated.
> So the current way is to do sanity checks in PRE_PEER_MODIFICATION state, and 
> in UPDATE_STORAGE state we will not do sanity checks any more, just 
> update(overwrite) the peer storage.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to