[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16443798#comment-16443798
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-18059:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2
        [build #632 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/632/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/632//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/632//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/632//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> The scanner order for memstore scanners are wrong
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-18059
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18059
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: regionserver, scan, Scanners
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Jingyun Tian
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-18059.master.001.patch
>
>
> This is comments for KeyValueScanner.getScannerOrder
> {code:title=KeyValueScanner.java}
>   /**
>    * Get the order of this KeyValueScanner. This is only relevant for 
> StoreFileScanners and
>    * MemStoreScanners (other scanners simply return 0). This is required for 
> comparing multiple
>    * files to find out which one has the latest data. StoreFileScanners are 
> ordered from 0
>    * (oldest) to newest in increasing order. MemStoreScanner gets LONG.max 
> since it always
>    * contains freshest data.
>    */
>   long getScannerOrder();
> {code}
> As now we may have multiple memstore scanners, I think the right way to 
> select scanner order for memstore scanner is to ordered from Long.MAX_VALUE 
> in decreasing order.
> But in CompactingMemStore and DefaultMemStore, the scanner order for memstore 
> scanner is also start from 0, which will be messed up with StoreFileScanners.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to