[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16445547#comment-16445547
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20455:
---------------------------------------
In your experiment with workloadx you use buffer size=2MB while the workload
was set to use buffer size=10KB
The values are also smaller so you need to run 100M ops and have 100M records
to write 25GB of data.
You can try using the shell script I posted HBASE-20188-xac.sh -- it pre-splits
the table which makes the experiment less "noisy".
If you want to have a bigger buffer size and run longer experiment you can just
run 500M ops.
> [IHC] Workloadx
> ---------------
>
> Key: HBASE-20455
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20455
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: stack
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> I tried workloadx from parent issue, the ycsb workload that is meant to make
> IHC shine. I'm doing something wrong. I tried just plugging it in.... and
> doing this:
> {code}
> ycsb run hbase12 -P /home/stack/ycsb/workloads/workloadx -p table=ycsb
> -threads 48 -cp /home/stack/conf_hbase -p columnfamily=family -p
> clientbuffering=true -p writebuffersize=2097152 -s -p maxexecutiontime=1200
> -jvm-args=-Xmx8192
> m -Djava.security.egd=file:/dev/./urandom -p recordcount=25000000 -p
> operationcount=25000000 -p
> exportfile=logs/ycsb-workloadx-measurements-ve0524-20180419T02:58:14Z.json -p
> exporter=com.yahoo.ycsb.measurements.exporter.JSONArrayMeasurementsExporter
> {code}
> It completes in a minute and a half. Claims stuff like this for throughput:
> 236825 ops/second. In this case I have in-memory-compaction set to NONE. I
> was going to compare before and after.
> [~eshcar]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
