[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13214156#comment-13214156
 ] 

Zhihong Yu commented on HBASE-5456:
-----------------------------------

>From Jim on asynchbase mailing list:

Works like a champ! Thanks a ton for telling me this... I had never realized 
that PowerMock extended the other mocking frameworks to offer the extended 
functionality such as Mocking Static, Final, Private, Constructor, and Partial 
... This makes things a lot easier to test.
                
> Introduce PowerMock into our unit tests to reduce unnecessary method exposure
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5456
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5456
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Zhihong Yu
>
> We should introduce PowerMock into our unit tests so that we don't have to 
> expose methods intended to be used by unit tests.
> Here was Benoit's reply to a user of asynchbase about testability:
> OpenTSDB has unit tests that are mocking out HBaseClient just fine
> [1].  You can mock out pretty much anything on the JVM: final,
> private, JDK stuff, etc.  All you need is the right tools.  I've been
> very happy with PowerMock.  It supports Mockito and EasyMock.
> I've never been keen on mutilating public interfaces for the sake of
> testing.  With tools like PowerMock, we can keep the public APIs tidy
> while mocking and overriding anything, even in the most private guts
> of the classes.
>  [1] 
> https://github.com/stumbleupon/opentsdb/blob/master/src/uid/TestUniqueId.java#L66

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to