[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16509063#comment-16509063
]
Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-20334:
-------------------------------------
Here's v1 running in a nightly branch:
https://builds.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/HBase%20Nightly/detail/HBASE-20331/43/pipeline/100
and here's the output logs of each of the three configurations that are tested:
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-20331/43/artifact/output-integration/
> add a test that expressly uses both our shaded client and the one from hadoop
> 3
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-20334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20334
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: hadoop3, shading
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Sean Busbey
> Assignee: Sean Busbey
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-20334.0.patch, HBASE-20334.1.patch
>
>
> Since we're making a shaded client that bleed out of our namespace and into
> Hadoop's, we should ensure that we can show our clients coexisting. Even if
> it's just an IT that successfully talks to both us and HDFS via our
> respective shaded clients, that'd be a big help in keeping us proactive.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
