[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16551358#comment-16551358
 ] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-20894:
--------------------------------

I was running related unit tests and got the following ?
{code}
testRetrieveFromFile[0: blockSize=8,192, 
bucketSizes=null](org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.bucket.TestBucketCache)  
Time elapsed: 1.15 sec  <<< ERROR!
org.apache.hbase.thirdparty.com.google.protobuf.UninitializedMessageException: 
Message missing required fields: access_counter
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.bucket.TestBucketCache.testRetrieveFromFile(TestBucketCache.java:266)

testRetrieveFromFile[1: blockSize=16,384, 
bucketSizes=[I@2ef5e5e3](org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.bucket.TestBucketCache)
  Time elapsed: 0.262 sec  <<< ERROR!
org.apache.hbase.thirdparty.com.google.protobuf.UninitializedMessageException: 
Message missing required fields: access_counter
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.bucket.TestBucketCache.testRetrieveFromFile(TestBucketCache.java:266)
{code}
Can you check whether access_counter field can be optional ?

Thanks

> Move BucketCache from java serialization to protobuf
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-20894
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20894
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: BucketCache
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Mike Drob
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-20894.WIP-2.patch, HBASE-20894.WIP.patch, 
> HBASE-20894.master.001.patch
>
>
> We should use a better serialization format instead of Java Serialization for 
> the BucketCache entry persistence.
> Suggested by Chris McCown, who does not appear to have a JIRA account.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to