[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13217647#comment-13217647 ]
jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on HBASE-5443: ------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/#review5364 ----------------------------------------------------------- here are some initial thoughts, let's make sure we get good discussion on this before commit. src/main/proto/HRegionProtocol.proto <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/#comment11671> I think we could collapse Put and Delete src/main/proto/HRegionProtocol.proto <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/#comment11672> typo src/main/proto/HRegionProtocol.proto <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/#comment11673> we seem to be missing a row here. src/main/proto/HRegionProtocol.proto <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/#comment11674> Why are the HLog-related things under HRegionProtocol? Seems like these shouldn't be exposed to clients. src/main/proto/HRegionProtocol.proto <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/#comment11675> would be nice to extract these "management interface" things from this protocol -- so the stuff that the average client needs goes in one place, and the stuff that only management tools would use go in another. src/main/proto/HRegionProtocol.proto <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/#comment11676> Also these calls which are supposed to only be called by the master, maybe we can move elsewhere src/main/proto/HRegionProtocol.proto <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/#comment11677> Can this be collapsed with CloseRegion? Maybe we can have a proto like: message RegionSpecifierProto { required RegionSpecifierType type = 1; required bytes data = 2; enum RegionSpecifierType { BY_REGION_ID_SHA1=0, BY_CONTAINED_ROW=1, BY_FULL_NAME=2 } } or something? Seems like it would be useful throughout to refer to regions in places where it's nice to have flexibility src/main/proto/HRegionProtocol.proto <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/#comment11678> why do we need a regioninfo here? we can locate the region by its split point, can't we? src/main/proto/hbase.proto <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/#comment11680> isn't the regionName just the concatenation of other fields here? src/main/proto/hbase.proto <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/#comment11679> these two don't seem to belong here, since they're transient *state* rather than properties of the region itself src/main/proto/hbase.proto <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/#comment11681> when do you set allTime? isn't "allTime" the same as setting both of the above to null? - Todd On 2012-02-27 18:54:31, Jimmy Xiang wrote: bq. bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: bq. https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/ bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. bq. (Updated 2012-02-27 18:54:31) bq. bq. bq. Review request for hbase. bq. bq. bq. Summary bq. ------- bq. bq. This is the first draft of the ProtoBuff HRegionProtocol. The corresponding java vs pb method mapping is attached to the jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5443 bq. bq. Please review. I'd like to move ahead after we get to some agreement. bq. bq. bq. This addresses bug HBASE-5443. bq. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5443 bq. bq. bq. Diffs bq. ----- bq. bq. pom.xml 066c027 bq. src/main/proto/HRegionProtocol.proto PRE-CREATION bq. src/main/proto/hbase.proto PRE-CREATION bq. bq. Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4054/diff bq. bq. bq. Testing bq. ------- bq. bq. bq. Thanks, bq. bq. Jimmy bq. bq. > Add PB-based calls to HRegionInterface > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-5443 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5443 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: ipc, master, migration, regionserver > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Jimmy Xiang > Fix For: 0.96.0 > > Attachments: region_java-proto-mapping.pdf > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira