[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16606496#comment-16606496
 ] 

huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-21102:
--------------------------------------

+1, a nit, the following else branch does not seem necessary. I did a test to 
verify that.

{code}
+    List<ServerName> usedSNs = new ArrayList<ServerName>(servers.size());
     do {
       int i = RANDOM.nextInt(numServers);
       sn = servers.get(i);
+      if (!usedSNs.contains(sn)) {
+        usedSNs.add(sn);
+      } else {
+        continue;
+      }
// Huaxiang: the else branch does not seem necessary. I did a test, with 
continue, it still // goes through the while conditions.
     } while (cluster.wouldLowerAvailability(regionInfo, sn)
         && iterations++ < maxIterations);
+    if (iterations >= maxIterations) {
+      // We have reached the max. Means the servers that we collected is still 
lowering the
+      // availability
+      for (ServerName unusedServer : servers) {
+        if (!usedSNs.contains(unusedServer)) {
+          // check if any other unused server is there for us to use.
+          // If so use it. Else we have not other go but to go with one of them
+          if (!cluster.wouldLowerAvailability(regionInfo, unusedServer)) {
+            sn = unusedServer;
+            break;
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
{code}

> ServerCrashProcedure should select target server where no other replicas 
> exist for the current region
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-21102
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21102
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Region Assignment
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HBASE-21102_1.patch, HBASE-21102_2.patch, 
> HBASE-21102_3.patch, HBASE-21102_initial.patch
>
>
> Currently when a server with region replica crashes, when the target server 
> is created for the replica region assignment there is no guarentee that a 
> server is selected where there is no other replica for the current region 
> getting assigned. It so happens that currently we do an assignment randomly 
> and later the LB comes and identifies these cases and again does MOVE for 
> such regions. It will be better if we can identify target servers at least 
> minimally ensuring that replicas are not colocated.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to