[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16662719#comment-16662719
]
stack commented on HBASE-19121:
-------------------------------
bq. I plan to migrate the function of checking consistency among meta,
regionserver and hdfs from hbck-1
Which parts are you thinking [~tianjingyun] ?
I did some writeup here on repair:
https://github.com/apache/hbase-operator-tools/tree/master/hbase-hbck2
Was trying to not repro in hbck2 tooling we have elsewhere.
That said, we could do with more operator help. I think tools to fix
hbase.version file and research to see if possible to rebuild a meta table if
for some reason meta were erased would be good to have.
Tooling that looked to see that all regions matched table state would be
helpful. In the above notes, we point folks at the tables UI section where you
can see table state and if all regions are OPEN/CLOSED. Canary is good for
confirming regions are where they claim to be.
What you thinking?
Thanks.
> HBCK for AMv2 (A.K.A HBCK2)
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-19121
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19121
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Umbrella
> Components: hbck, hbck2
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: Umesh Agashe
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: hbck2-1.0.0
>
> Attachments: hbase-19121.master.001.patch
>
>
> We don't have an hbck for the new AM. Old hbck may actually do damage going
> against AMv2.
> Fix.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
