[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Allan Yang updated HBASE-21395: ------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HBASE-21395.branch-2.0.002.patch) > Abort split/merge procedure if there is a table procedure of the same table > going on > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HBASE-21395 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21395 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 2.1.0, 2.0.2 > Reporter: Allan Yang > Assignee: Allan Yang > Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.1.2 > > Attachments: HBASE-21395.branch-2.0.001.patch, > HBASE-21395.branch-2.0.002.patch > > > In my ITBLL, I often see that if split/merge procedure and table > procedure(like ModifyTableProcedure) happen at the same time, and since there > some race conditions between these two kind of procedures, causing some > serious problems. e.g. the split/merged parent is bought on line by the table > procedure or the split merged region making the whole table procedure > rollback. > Talked with [~Apache9] offline today, this kind of problem was solved in > branch-2+ since There is a fence that only one RTSP can agianst a single > region at the same time. > To keep out of the mess in branch-2.0 and branch-2.1, I added a simple safe > fence in the split/merge procedure: If there is a table procedure going on > against the same table, then abort the split/merge procedure. Aborting the > split/merge procedure at the beginning of the execution is no big deal, > compared with the mess it will cause... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)