[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16666088#comment-16666088
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-21395:
-----------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
13s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} test4tests {color} | {color:orange}
0m 0s{color} | {color:orange} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or
modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also
please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-2.0 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
57s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.0 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
50s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.0 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
11s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.0 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 4m
1s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
29s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.0 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.0 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
40s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
43s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 1m
43s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 3m
54s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}
8m 13s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.6.5
2.7.4 or 3.0.0. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
22s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}130m 40s{color}
| {color:red} hbase-server in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}165m 25s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hbase.client.TestAdmin1 |
| | hadoop.hbase.snapshot.TestMobFlushSnapshotFromClient |
| | hadoop.hbase.snapshot.TestFlushSnapshotFromClient |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.TestAsyncRegionAdminApi2 |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hbase:6f01af0 |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-21395 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12945883/HBASE-21395.branch-2.0.002.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit findbugs
shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile |
| uname | Linux 68f6025c53e4 3.13.0-143-generic #192-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 27
10:45:36 UTC 2018 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality |
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
|
| git revision | branch-2.0 / a3b2686114 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.5.4
(1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe; 2018-06-17T18:33:14Z) |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_181 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC3 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14884/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14884/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 3966 (vs. ulimit of 10000) |
| modules | C: hbase-server U: hbase-server |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14884/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Abort split/merge procedure if there is a table procedure of the same table
> going on
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-21395
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21395
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 2.1.0, 2.0.2
> Reporter: Allan Yang
> Assignee: Allan Yang
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.1.2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-21395.branch-2.0.001.patch,
> HBASE-21395.branch-2.0.002.patch
>
>
> In my ITBLL, I often see that if split/merge procedure and table
> procedure(like ModifyTableProcedure) happen at the same time, and since there
> some race conditions between these two kind of procedures, causing some
> serious problems. e.g. the split/merged parent is bought on line by the table
> procedure or the split merged region making the whole table procedure
> rollback.
> Talked with [~Apache9] offline today, this kind of problem was solved in
> branch-2+ since There is a fence that only one RTSP can agianst a single
> region at the same time.
> To keep out of the mess in branch-2.0 and branch-2.1, I added a simple safe
> fence in the split/merge procedure: If there is a table procedure going on
> against the same table, then abort the split/merge procedure. Aborting the
> split/merge procedure at the beginning of the execution is no big deal,
> compared with the mess it will cause...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
