[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13226368#comment-13226368
]
Lars Hofhansl edited comment on HBASE-5542 at 3/9/12 7:35 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Can we let this sit for a bit? I would like to spend some time thinking about
this. doMiniBatchPut almost follows the same logic, should be able to unify
that code as well. It's not needed for 0.94, so it's not time critical.
Thanks for working on this Scott!
was (Author: lhofhansl):
Can we let this sit for a bit. I would like to spend some time thinking
about this. doMiniBatchPut almost follows the same logic, should be able to
unify that code as well. It's not needed for 0.94, so it's not time critical.
Thanks for working on this Scott!
> Unify HRegion.mutateRowsWithLocks() and HRegion.processRow()
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5542
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5542
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Scott Chen
> Assignee: Scott Chen
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-5542.D2217.1.patch, HBASE-5542.D2217.2.patch
>
>
> mutateRowsWithLocks() does atomic mutations on multiple rows.
> processRow() does atomic read-modify-writes on a single row.
> It will be useful to generalize both and have a
> processRowsWithLocks() that does atomic read-modify-writes on multiple rows.
> This also helps reduce some redundancy in the codes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
