[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16748278#comment-16748278
]
stack edited comment on HBASE-21512 at 1/21/19 11:59 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------
Any chance of an update on where this project is at now [~Apache9] given your
recent work? A high-level will help when doing the lower-level reviews. For
instance, ClusterConnection has almost nothing in it now. Should it continue?
Or intent is it is server-side only.... Thanks.
was (Author: stack):
Any chance of an update on where this project is at now [~Apache9] given your
recent work? A high-level will help when doing the lower-level reviews. For
instance, ClusterConnection has almost nothing in it now. Should it continue?
Thanks.
> Introduce an AsyncClusterConnection and replace the usage of ClusterConnection
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-21512
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21512
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Umbrella
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> At least for the RSProcedureDispatcher, with CompletableFuture we do not need
> to set a delay and use a thread pool any more, which could reduce the
> resource usage and also the latency.
> Once this is done, I think we can remove the ClusterConnection completely,
> and start to rewrite the old sync client based on the async client, which
> could reduce the code base a lot for our client.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
