[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16752229#comment-16752229
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-21729:
--------------------------------

Results for branch master
        [build #745 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/745/]: (x) 
*{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/745//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/745//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/745//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> Extract ProcedureCoordinatorRpcs and ProcedureMemberRpcs from 
> CoordinatedStateManager
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-21729
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21729
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Jingyun Tian
>            Assignee: Jingyun Tian
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HBASE-21729.branch-2.001.patch, 
> HBASE-21729.master.001.patch, HBASE-21729.master.002.patch, 
> HBASE-21729.master.003.patch
>
>
> If procedureV2 based WAL splitting is enabled, CoordinatedStateManager will 
> not be initialized and will be useless when we switch to procedureV2 WAL 
> splitting. To remove this class in the futrue, we need to extract  
> getProcedureMemberRpcs() and getProcedureCoordinatorRpcs(), which are 
> actually not related to WAL splitting.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to