[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16753041#comment-16753041
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-21512:
--------------------------------

Results for branch HBASE-21512
        [build #71 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-21512/71/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-21512/71//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-21512/71//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-21512/71//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> Introduce an AsyncClusterConnection and replace the usage of ClusterConnection
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-21512
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21512
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Umbrella
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> At least for the RSProcedureDispatcher, with CompletableFuture we do not need 
> to set a delay and use a thread pool any more, which could reduce the 
> resource usage and also the latency.
> Once this is done, I think we can remove the ClusterConnection completely, 
> and start to rewrite the old sync client based on the async client, which 
> could reduce the code base a lot for our client.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to