[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13229515#comment-13229515
]
Chinmay Dhodapkar commented on HBASE-3692:
------------------------------------------
@anyone
We using CDH3u0 dist and we see the same issue. It occurs during htable.put.
Increasing the pool size seems to delay the issue (or just reduce the
probability) . [HTablePool(conf, 100) vs HTablePool(conf, Interger.MAX_VALUE)]
As per CDH support, HBASE-3777 along with the thread management changes in
HBASE-3553 might have solved this issue....but I seriously doubt it. Just
wanted to check if anybody tried CDH3u3 before i embark onto a wild goose
chase...
Thanks.
> Handle RejectedExecutionException in HTable
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-3692
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3692
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.90.1
> Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
> Attachments: test_datanucleus.zip
>
>
> A user on IRC yesterday had an issue with RejectedExecutionException coming
> out of HTable sometimes. Apart from being very confusing to the user as it
> comes with no message at all, it exposes the HTable internals.
> I think we should handle it and instead throw something like
> DontUseHTableInMultipleThreadsException or something more clever. In his
> case, the user had a HTable leak with the pool that he was able to figure out
> once I told him what to look for.
> It could be an unchecked exception and we could consider adding in 0.90 but
> marking for 0.92 at the moment.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
