[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16782282#comment-16782282 ]
Hudson commented on HBASE-21917: -------------------------------- Results for branch HBASE-21917 [build #2 on builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-21917/2/]: (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* ---- details (if available): (x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color} -- For more information [see general report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-21917/2//General_Nightly_Build_Report/] (x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color} -- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-21917/2//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/] (x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color} -- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-21917/2//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/] (x) {color:red}-1 source release artifact{color} -- See build output for details. (x) {color:red}-1 client integration test{color} -- Something went wrong with this stage, [check relevant console output|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-21917/2//console]. > Make the HFileBlock#validateChecksum can accept ByteBuff as an input. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-21917 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21917 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Zheng Hu > Assignee: Zheng Hu > Priority: Major > Attachments: HBASE-21917.v1.patch, HBASE-21917.v2.patch, > HBASE-21917.v3.patch, HBASE-21917.v4.patch > > > I've tried to make a patch for HBASE-21879, most of work seems to be fine, > but the trouble is: > HFileBlock#validateChecksum can only accept ByteBuffer as its input, while > after the HBASE-21916, we will use an ourself-defined ByteBuff (which can be > SingleByteBuff or MultiByteBuff). > Now, need to create our own ByteBuff checksum validation method, should not > be so hard but an separate issue will be more clearer. > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)