[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16785858#comment-16785858
]
stack commented on HBASE-21935:
-------------------------------
[~busbey] Thanks boss. Yeah. Pushed it exiting last night... Bit baffling
given running same commands in same context post-failure seem to work fine.
Something 'interesting' going on. Thanks for input.
> Replace make_rc.sh with customized spark/dev/create-release
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-21935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21935
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: rm
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: rm
> Attachments: HBASE-21935.branch-2.1.001.patch,
> HBASE-21935.branch-2.1.002.patch, HBASE-21935.branch-2.1.003.patch,
> HBASE-21935.branch-2.1.004.patch, HBASE-21935.branch-2.1.005.patch,
> HBASE-21935.branch-2.1.006.patch, HBASE-21935.branch-2.1.007.patch
>
>
> The spark/dev/create-release is more comprehensive than our hokey make_rc.sh
> script. It codifies the bulk of the RM process from tagging, version-setting,
> building, signing, and pushing. It does it in a container so environment is
> same each time. It has a bunch of spark-specifics as is -- naturally -- but
> should be possible to pull it around to suit hbase RM'ing. It'd save a bunch
> of time and would allow us to get to a place where RM'ing is canned,
> evolvable, and consistent.
> I've been hacking on the tooling before the filing of this JIRA and was
> polluting branch-2.0 w/ tagging and reverts. Let me make a branch named for
> this JIRA to play with (There is a dry-run flag but it too needs work...).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
