[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16814998#comment-16814998
]
Toshihiro Suzuki edited comment on HBASE-22144 at 4/11/19 1:29 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
{quote}
but I don't want to convolute this bug fix with changing how the implementation
works, especially when this is public API (and we have to be certain that we
aren't breaking user-code).
{quote}
Okay I see. Then +1.
Will create another Jira ticket for what I mentioned in my last comment maybe
for 3.0 as it's an incompatible change.
was (Author: brfrn169):
{quote}
but I don't want to convolute this bug fix with changing how the implementation
works, especially when this is public API (and we have to be certain that we
aren't breaking user-code).
{quote}
Okay I see. Then +1.
Will create another Jira ticket for what I mentioned in my last comment maybe
for 3.0 as it's incompatible change.
> MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-22144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-22144.001.patch, HBASE-22144.002.patch,
> HBASE-22144.002.patch
>
>
> It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with
> reverse scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that
> we are always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be
> rewritten to "traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the
> scan being used.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
