[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16833522#comment-16833522
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-17028:
----------------------------------------
The doc changes looks good.
bq.`W-TinyLFU`
Are we case sensitive in the code? I haven't checked the new on heap cache code
yet!
> New 2.0 blockcache (tinylfu) doesn't have inmemory partition, etc Update doc
> and codebase accordingly
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17028
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17028
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: BlockCache
> Reporter: stack
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-17028.patch
>
>
> Intent is to make the parent tinylfu blockcache default on in 2.0 replacing
> our old lru blockcache. This issue is about making it clear in doc and code
> how the new blockcache differs from the old (You can put back the old lru
> blockcache with config change).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
