[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16842436#comment-16842436
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-21991:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2.2
        [build #265 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/265/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- Something went wrong running this stage, please [check relevant console 
output|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/265//console].




(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/265//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- Something went wrong running this stage, please [check relevant console 
output|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/265//console].


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(x) {color:red}-1 client integration test{color}
--Failed when running client tests on top of Hadoop 2. [see log for 
details|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/265//artifact/output-integration/hadoop-2.log].
 (note that this means we didn't run on Hadoop 3)


> Fix MetaMetrics issues - [Race condition, Faulty remove logic], few 
> improvements
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-21991
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21991
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Coprocessors, metrics
>            Reporter: Sakthi
>            Assignee: Sakthi
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 1.5.0, 2.2.0, 1.4.10, 2.3.0
>
>         Attachments: hbase-21991.addendum.patch, 
> hbase-21991.branch-1.001.patch, hbase-21991.branch-1.002.patch, 
> hbase-21991.master.001.patch, hbase-21991.master.002.patch, 
> hbase-21991.master.003.patch, hbase-21991.master.004.patch, 
> hbase-21991.master.005.patch, hbase-21991.master.006.patch
>
>
> Here is a list of the issues related to the MetaMetrics implementation:
> +*Bugs*+:
>  # [_Lossy counting for top-k_] *Faulty remove logic of non-eligible meters*: 
> Under certain conditions, we might end up storing/exposing all the meters 
> rather than top-k-ish
>  # MetaMetrics can throw NPE resulting in aborting of the RS because of a 
> *Race Condition*.
> +*Improvements*+:
>  # With high number of regions in the cluster, exposure of metrics for each 
> region blows up the JMX from ~140 Kbs to 100+ Mbs depending on the number of 
> regions. It's better to use *lossy counting to maintain top-k for region 
> metrics* as well.
>  # As the lossy meters do not represent actual counts, I think, it'll be 
> better to *rename the meters to include "lossy" in the name*. It would be 
> more informative while monitoring the metrics and there would be less 
> confusion regarding actual counts to lossy counts.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to