[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13240998#comment-13240998 ]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-5670: -------------------------------------- Thanks Stack. Since you can pass List<Row> to a method that takes List<? extends Row> it'll work without the need to recompile anything. The client<->server communication is done via HConnection.processBatch, which is public and actually already takes List<? extends Row>. Seems the List<Row> interface in HTable was just an oversight. > Have Mutation implement the Row interface. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HBASE-5670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5670 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Lars Hofhansl > Assignee: Lars Hofhansl > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.94.1 > > Attachments: 5670-0.94.txt, 5670-trunk.txt > > > In HBASE-4347 I factored some code from Put/Delete/Append in Mutation. > In a discussion with a co-worker I noticed that Put/Delete/Append still > implement the Row interface, but Mutation does not. > In a trivial change I would like to move that interface up to Mutation, along > with changing HTable.batch(List<Row>) to HTable.batch(List<? extends Row>) > (HConnection.processBatch takes List<? extends Row> already anyway), so that > HTable.batch can be used with a list of Mutations. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira