[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13246809#comment-13246809 ]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-5335: ---------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521391/HBASE-5335-trunk-2.patch against trunk revision . +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 20 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 4 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.TestHBaseFsck org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegion org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1394//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1394//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1394//console This message is automatically generated. > Dynamic Schema Configurations > ----------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-5335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5335 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Nicolas Spiegelberg > Assignee: Nicolas Spiegelberg > Labels: configuration, schema > Fix For: 0.96.0 > > Attachments: D2247.1.patch, D2247.2.patch, D2247.3.patch, > D2247.4.patch, D2247.5.patch, D2247.6.patch, D2247.7.patch, D2247.8.patch, > HBASE-5335-trunk-2.patch, HBASE-5335-trunk.patch > > > Currently, the ability for a core developer to add per-table & per-CF > configuration settings is very heavyweight. You need to add a reserved > keyword all the way up the stack & you have to support this variable > long-term if you're going to expose it explicitly to the user. This has > ended up with using Configuration.get() a lot because it is lightweight and > you can tweak settings while you're trying to understand system behavior > [since there are many config params that may never need to be tuned]. We > need to add the ability to put & read arbitrary KV settings in the HBase > schema. Combined with online schema change, this will allow us to safely > iterate on configuration settings. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira