[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13252976#comment-13252976
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-5778:
-------------------------------
Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #2749 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/2749/])
HBASE-5778 Turn on WAL compression by default (Revision 1325566)
Result = FAILURE
jdcryans :
Files :
*
/hbase/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/wal/SequenceFileLogWriter.java
> Turn on WAL compression by default
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5778
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5778
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
> Assignee: Jean-Daniel Cryans
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.94.0, 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-5778.patch
>
>
> I ran some tests to verify if WAL compression should be turned on by default.
> For a use case where it's not very useful (values two order of magnitude
> bigger than the keys), the insert time wasn't different and the CPU usage 15%
> higher (150% CPU usage VS 130% when not compressing the WAL).
> When values are smaller than the keys, I saw a 38% improvement for the insert
> run time and CPU usage was 33% higher (600% CPU usage VS 450%). I'm not sure
> WAL compression accounts for all the additional CPU usage, it might just be
> that we're able to insert faster and we spend more time in the MemStore per
> second (because our MemStores are bad when they contain tens of thousands of
> values).
> Those are two extremes, but it shows that for the price of some CPU we can
> save a lot. My machines have 2 quads with HT, so I still had a lot of idle
> CPUs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
