[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17125811#comment-17125811
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-15785:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-1
[build #1308 on
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/1308/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/1308//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk7 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk7
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/1308//JDK7_Nightly_Build_Report/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/1308//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]
(x) {color:red}-1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
> Unnecessary lock in ByteBufferArray
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15785
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15785
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: regionserver, Scanners
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Anoop Sam John
> Assignee: Anoop Sam John
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15785.patch, HBASE-15785_V2.patch,
> HBASE-15785_V3.patch
>
>
> {code}
> Lock lock = locks[i];
> lock.lock();
> try {
> ByteBuffer bb = buffers[i];
> if (i == startBuffer) {
> cnt = bufferSize - startBufferOffset;
> if (cnt > len) cnt = len;
> ByteBuffer dup = bb.duplicate();
> dup.limit(startBufferOffset + cnt).position(startBufferOffset);
> mbb[j] = dup.slice();
> {code}
> In asSubByteBuff, we work on the duplicate BB and set limit and position on
> that.. The locking is not needed here.
> The locking is added because we set limit and position on the BBs in the
> array. We can duplicate the BBs and do positioning and limit on them. The
> locking can be fully avoided.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)