ndimiduk commented on pull request #1844: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/1844#issuecomment-639667285
@busbey > the intro paragraph explains the warning sign designation but it is not used at all Oh you're right. Since I pulled out the non-LTS releases, that category is unused. I could drop it entirely, I suppose, or redefine it. > jdk11 has a green check mark, which is explained as an expected deployment type, but then has a note that describes limitations to the readiness that sound a lot like the explanation of the warning sign / yellow designation. why not just list it as warning sign / yellow and keep the same note that explains why? That would be fine. I think that since the defined meaning of yellow/warning is not used, we can use this indication for this purpose instead. > do we still need to list jdk6 if it is a no everywhere? The intro paragraph could just say "if a version is not listed you should assume it is (x)". e.g. we don't list jdk 1.5 or 1.4 but I don't think anyone is expecting us to. Existing content mentioned JDK6, so I preserved it's mention. I can drop explicit mention of JDK6 and add the language you describe. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
