[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17132855#comment-17132855
]
Josh Elser commented on HBASE-8458:
-----------------------------------
I've pushed this to master. I see this is tagged for 2.4.0 – is there appetite
to cherry-pick this back to branch-2 as well?
Could you write some release notes and then resolve this, [~brfrn169]?
Thanks for your great work!
> Support for batch version of checkAndMutate()
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8458
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8458
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Client, regionserver
> Reporter: Hari Mankude
> Assignee: Toshihiro Suzuki
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.4.0
>
>
> The use case is that the user has multiple threads loading hundreds of keys
> into a hbase table. Occasionally there are collisions in the keys being
> uploaded by different threads. So for correctness, it is required to do
> checkAndMutate() instead of a put(). However, doing a checkAndMutate() rpc
> for every key update is non optimal. It would be good to have a batch version
> of checkAndMutate() similar to batch put(). The client can partition the keys
> on region boundaries.
> The jira is NOT looking for any type of cross-row locking or multi-row
> atomicity with checkAndMutate().
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
