[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17244905#comment-17244905 ]
shenshengli commented on HBASE-21874: ------------------------------------- [~ram_krish] Only one directory can be configured here, but multiple hardware is usually used, such as 1T (8*128G) App Direct, in which case I want to configure 512G bucketCache, must poolSet be used? > Bucket cache on Persistent memory > --------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-21874 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21874 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: BucketCache > Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha-1 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.3.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-21874.branch-2.2.001.patch, HBASE-21874.patch, > HBASE-21874.patch, HBASE-21874_V2.patch, HBASE-21874_V4.patch, > HBASE-21874_V5.patch, HBASE-21874_V6.patch, Pmem_BC.png > > > Non volatile persistent memory devices are byte addressable like DRAM (for > eg. Intel DCPMM). Bucket cache implementation can take advantage of this new > memory type and can make use of the existing offheap data structures to serve > data directly from this memory area without having to bring the data to > onheap. > The patch is a new IOEngine implementation that works with the persistent > memory. > Note : Here we don't make use of the persistence nature of the device and > just make use of the big memory it provides. > Performance numbers to follow. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)