[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17244905#comment-17244905
]
shenshengli commented on HBASE-21874:
-------------------------------------
[~ram_krish] Only one directory can be configured here, but multiple hardware
is usually used, such as 1T (8*128G) App Direct, in which case I want to
configure 512G bucketCache, must poolSet be used?
> Bucket cache on Persistent memory
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-21874
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21874
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: BucketCache
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha-1
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.3.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-21874.branch-2.2.001.patch, HBASE-21874.patch,
> HBASE-21874.patch, HBASE-21874_V2.patch, HBASE-21874_V4.patch,
> HBASE-21874_V5.patch, HBASE-21874_V6.patch, Pmem_BC.png
>
>
> Non volatile persistent memory devices are byte addressable like DRAM (for
> eg. Intel DCPMM). Bucket cache implementation can take advantage of this new
> memory type and can make use of the existing offheap data structures to serve
> data directly from this memory area without having to bring the data to
> onheap.
> The patch is a new IOEngine implementation that works with the persistent
> memory.
> Note : Here we don't make use of the persistence nature of the device and
> just make use of the big memory it provides.
> Performance numbers to follow.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
