[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13278052#comment-13278052
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-5926:
----------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12527860/5926.v9.patch
  against trunk revision .

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

    +1 hadoop23.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 0.23.x profile.

    +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

    -1 findbugs.  The patch appears to introduce 33 new Findbugs (version 
1.3.9) warnings.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

    +1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1912//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1912//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1912//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> Delete the master znode after a master crash
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5926
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5926
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: master, scripts
>    Affects Versions: 0.96.0
>            Reporter: nkeywal
>            Assignee: nkeywal
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: 5926.v6.patch, 5926.v8.patch, 5926.v9.patch
>
>
> This is the continuation of the work done in HBASE-5844.
> But we can't apply exactly the same strategy: for the region server, there is 
> a znode per region server, while for the master & backup master there is a 
> single znode for both.
> So if we apply the same strategy as for a regionserver, we may have this 
> scenario:
> 1) Master starts
> 2) Backup master starts
> 3) Master dies
> 4) ZK detects it
> 5) Backup master receives the update from ZK
> 6) Backup master creates the new master node and become the main master
> 7) Previous master script continues
> 8) Previous master script deletes the master node in ZK
> 9) => issue: we deleted the node just created by the new master
> This should not happen often (usually the znode will be deleted soon enough), 
> but it can happen.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to