[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17339036#comment-17339036
]
junwen yang commented on HBASE-25340:
-------------------------------------
Hi, [~pankajkumar], just a quick update that we have rewritten the tool in
Java. Let me know if you need any help to integrate this into your system. We
are more than willing to help!
> Protobuf Mesage Incompatibility Detector
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-25340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25340
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.3.3, 2.2.6
> Reporter: junwen yang
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: protoCompatibility.txt
>
>
> Regarding the issue HBASE-25238. caused by the incompatibility of protobuf
> message, we have created a static checker which keeps track of the proto file
> change, and detect potential incompatibility:
> # Add/delete required field, which is exactly the case reported in
> HBASE-25238.
> # The tag number of a field has been changed, as described in HDFS-9788.
> Also, the [protobuf guidelines
> |https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto]suggests _each
> field in the message definition has a *unique number*. These numbers are used
> to identify your fields in the [message binary
> format|https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/encoding], and
> should not be changed once your message type is in use_.
> # A required field has been changed to optional, or an optional field has
> been changed to required. According to the guidelines in [protobuf official
> website|https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto],
> _*Required Is Forever* You should be very careful about marking fields as
> {{required}}. If at some point you wish to stop writing or sending a required
> field, it will be problematic to change the field to an optional field - old
> readers will consider messages without this field to be incomplete and may
> reject or drop them unintentionally. You should consider writing
> application-specific custom validation routines for your buffers instead._
> We have applied our checker on the frequently maintained HBASE versions:
> rel/1.4.3, rel/1.6.0, rel/2.2.6, rel/2.3.3, and master, and we found 37
> potential problems as attached, which includes the one found in HBASE-25238.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
