[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17462334#comment-17462334 ]
Hudson commented on HBASE-26233: -------------------------------- Results for branch HBASE-26233 [build #11 on builds.a.o|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-26233/11/]: (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* ---- details (if available): (/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color} -- For more information [see general report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-26233/11/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/] (/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color} -- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-26233/11/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/] (x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color} -- For more information [see jdk11 report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-26233/11/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/] (/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color} -- See build output for details. (/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color} > The region replication framework should not be built upon the general > replication framework > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-26233 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26233 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Umbrella > Components: read replicas > Reporter: Duo Zhang > Assignee: Duo Zhang > Priority: Major > > At least, at the source path, where we track the edits, we should not make > region replication rely on general replication framework. > The difficulty here for switching to a table based storage is that, the WAL > system and replication system highly depend on each other. There will be > cyclic dependency if we want to store replication peer and queue data in a > hbase table. > And after HBASE-18070, even meta wal provider will be integrated together > with replication system, which makes things more difficult. > But in general, for region replication, it is not a big deal to lose some > edits, a flush can fix everything, which means we do not so heavy tracking > system in the general replication system. > We should find a more light-weighted way to do region replication. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)