[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13405594#comment-13405594 ]
Zhihong Ted Yu commented on HBASE-6284: --------------------------------------- TestZooKeeper passed locally. Patch v3 integrated to trunk. Thanks for the patch, Anoop. Please prepare patch for 0.94. > Introduce HRegion#doMiniBatchMutation() > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-6284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6284 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: performance, regionserver > Reporter: Zhihong Ted Yu > Assignee: Anoop Sam John > Fix For: 0.96.0, 0.94.2 > > Attachments: 6284_Trunk-V3.patch, HBASE-6284_Trunk-V2.patch, > HBASE-6284_Trunk-V3.patch, HBASE-6284_Trunk.patch > > > From Anoop under thread 'Can there be a doMiniBatchDelete in HRegion': > The HTable#delete(List<Delete>) groups the Deletes for the same RS and make > one n/w call only. But within the RS, there will be N number of delete calls > on the region one by one. This will include N number of HLog write and sync. > If this also can be grouped can we get better performance for the multi row > delete. > I have made the new miniBatchDelete () and made the > HTable#delete(List<Delete>) to call this new batch delete. > Just tested initially with the one node cluster. In that itself I am getting > a performance boost which is very much promising. > Only one CF and qualifier. > 10K total rows delete with a batch of 100 deletes. Only deletes happening on > the table from one thread. > With the new way the net time taken is reduced by more than 1/10 > Will test in a 4 node cluster also. I think it will worth doing this change. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira