[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17806425#comment-17806425
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-28287:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2.6
        [build #30 on 
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/30/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/30/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/30/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/30/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/30/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> MOB HFiles are expired earlier than their reference data
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-28287
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28287
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: mob
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.0
>            Reporter: WenjingLiu
>            Assignee: WenjingLiu
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 2.6.0, 2.4.18, 2.5.8, 3.0.0-beta-2
>
>
> I have observed that mob HFiles are expired earlier than their reference 
> data. Upon reviewing the relevant code, it was observed that the standard 
> expired timestamp is not accurately set. The issue arises from the fact that 
> if we do not set the calendar to the MILLISECOND level, a three-digit random 
> number is appended to the end of the expired timestamp, leading to 
> inaccuracies.
> For instance, if we write mob data to a Time-To-Live (1 day) table at 22:00 
> on 12/20/2023, and the ExpiredMobFileCleaner begins to work at 20:00 on 
> 12/21/2023, the timestamp of the mob HFile will be parsed as 1703001600000, 
> and the StandardExpiredTS is calculated as 1703001600314 with the three-digit 
> random number as MILLISECOND. Consequently, the StandardExpiredTS >= 
> MobHfileTS, thus indicating that the mob HFile should be expired. However, it 
> is observed that this mob HFile only exists for 22 hours, which is less than 
> the specified one-day-time threshold.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to