[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17901917#comment-17901917
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-29000:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-2
[build #1196 on
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1196/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1196/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1196/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1196/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk17 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1196/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1196/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1196/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1196/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for HBase 2 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.5 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.6 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.4.0 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.4.1 {color}
> SLF4j logging backend incorrectly picked up from Hadoop when external Hadoop
> is specified
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-29000
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29000
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: logging, scripts
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-beta-1, 2.7.0, 2.6.1, 2.5.10
> Reporter: Istvan Toth
> Assignee: Istvan Toth
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 2.7.0, 3.0.0-beta-2, 2.5.11, 2.6.2
>
>
> When I set HADOOP_CLASSPATH:
> {noformat}
> SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings.
> SLF4J: Found binding in
> [jar:file:/home/stoty/x/hadoop-3.4.1/share/hadoop/common/lib/slf4j-reload4j-1.7.36.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
> SLF4J: Found binding in
> [jar:file:/home/stoty/workspaces/hbase/hbase/hbase-assembly/target/hbase-2.5.11-SNAPSHOT-client/lib/client-facing-thirdparty/log4j-slf4j-impl-2.17.2.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
> SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#multiple_bindings for an
> explanation.
> SLF4J: Actual binding is of type [org.slf4j.impl.Reload4jLoggerFactory]
> {noformat}
> HBase should always pick its own log4j2 backend.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
