[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17931589#comment-17931589
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-28513:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-3
[build #387 on
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/387/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/387/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/387/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/387/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/387/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/387/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 source release artifact{color}
-- Something went wrong with this stage, [check relevant console
output|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/387//console].
(x) {color:red}-1 client integration test{color}
-- Something went wrong with this stage, [check relevant console
output|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/387//console].
> The StochasticLoadBalancer should support discrete evaluations for replica
> distribution
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-28513
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28513
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Balancer
> Reporter: Ray Mattingly
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> I have a larger write up available
> [here|https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jA8Ghs86v7b-53j5DcsdbPnOXxbHjewkIBFi1E4S1pY/edit?usp=sharing].
> Secondary replica balancing squashes all other cost considerations.
> Basically there are a few cost functions with relatively huge default
> multipliers. For example `PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction` has a default
> multiplier of 100,000. Meanwhile things like StoreFileCostFunction have a
> multiplier of 5. Having any multiplier of 100k, while others are single
> digit, basically makes the latter category totally irrelevant from balancer
> considerations.
> I understand that it's critical to distribute a region's replicas across
> multiple hosts/racks, but I don't think we should do this at the expense of
> all other balancer considerations.
> For example, maybe we could have two types of balancer considerations: costs
> (as we do now), and conditionals (for the more discrete considerations, like
> ">1 replica of the same region should not exist on a single host"). This
> would allow us to prioritize replica distribution _and_ maintain
> consideration for things like storefile balance.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
