[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17948408#comment-17948408
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-29249:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2
        [build #1265 on 
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk17 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop 3.3.5 backward compatibility checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop 3.3.6 backward compatibility checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop 3.4.0 backward compatibility checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for HBase 2 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.5 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.6 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.4.0 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.4.1 {color}


> Allow for BlockCache implementations to define dynamic properties
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-29249
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29249
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-beta-1, 4.0.0-alpha-1, 2.7.0, 2.6.2
>            Reporter: Wellington Chevreuil
>            Assignee: Wellington Chevreuil
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 4.0.0-alpha-1, 2.7.0, 2.6.3
>
>
> We have some customers use case finding useful to have some of the 
> BucketCache configurations dynamically set, such as the accept factor or the 
> queue addition wait time. 
> HBASE-28517 has already made some other cache related properties dynamically 
> configurable, and CacheConfig already implements the 
> ConfigurationObserver and registers itself for config changes notifications. 
> Since CacheConfig holds a reference for the BlockCache implementation, we 
> could just allow for BlockCache implementation to define their own dynamic 
> configuration logic by define a refreshConfig method in the BlockCache 
> interface that would get called from CacheConfig.onConfigurationChange().
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to